|
Rick Collingwood's
Hypnosis Cancer Therapy
Introduction / Trial Participant
1 / Trial Participant
2 / Trial Participant
3 / Trial Participant
4
Trial
Participant 5 / Trial Participant
6 / Trial Participant
7 / Trial Participant
8 / Trial Participant
9 Cancer Trial
Results / Cancer trial
References / Cancer Hypnosis
Testimonials
Results of the Cancer Trials
Collingwood BR, Elliott NJ.*
Australian Academy of Hypnosis TM and Advanced
Mind Dynamics Pty Ltd, Perth, Australia.
Abstract
Complimentary and alternative medicine (CAM) used
by cancer patients is becoming much more prevalent the world over.
Many beneficial outcomes have been seen from the addition of
hypnosis to conventional protocols. As with all treatments, the
focus of the hypnotherapy is to ameliorate the effects of pain and
to restore a level of psychological and physical wellbeing and
functioning Methods: The EORTC QOL-QC 30 core questionnaire was
used to assess changes in perceived quality of life. Each patient
received six hypnotherapy sessions; the sessions were conducted by
the same hypnotherapist each time and questionnaires completed
prior to induction of trance.
Results: Responses from the
questionnaire were evaluated comparing the initial questionnaire
with the final questionnaire. Statistically significant
improvements were noted with Fatigue (fa) (35.75% to 12.38%;
p<0.0044), Global health status (ql) (63.5% to 79.00%;
p<0.0058), Insomnia (sl) (53.75% to 8.25%; p<0.008) and
Physical functioning (pf) (75.75% to 87.25%; p<0.0395) All
aspects of the questionnaire showed improvement following the six
hypnosis sessions.
Conclusions: Overall patients
experienced the benefit of hypnosis in reducing symptoms and
increasing their overall quality of life. Many patients commented
that commencing hypnosis at the time of diagnosis of cancer, and
continuing throughout their treatment, would have been greatly
beneficial. In this study, specific non-Ericksonian hypnosis
techniques were beneficial for symptom control and in increasing
the quality of life in patients with cancer.
Background:Complimentary and alternative medicine (CAM) used
by cancer patients is becoming much more prevalent around the
world. Patients with all the tumour types and stages use CAM [1] in
the hope of cure, disease control, longer survival, improved
quality of life and palliation. Most CAM is the used in addition to
current conventional medical treatment, therefore it does not
reduce health costs and disclosure to physicians is usually
incomplete. [1,2] Breast cancer patients who use CAM tend to have
higher levels of psychosocial distress.[3] CAM-CANCER is a
retrospective literature analysis which hopes to generate
statements on CAM in cancer. [4]

Introduction
During the period surrounding the diagnosis of
cancer people can experience anxiety, emotional and physical
distress and mood disturbance. During treatment these symptoms are
often compounded by treatment side-effects including nausea,
vomiting, procedural and disease related physical pain and
symptoms. Conventional medicine targets pain, distress and
depression however conventional treatments do not always relieve
these symptoms to patient satisfaction. Often these patients will
opt for complementary and alternative medicine such as acupuncture,
naturopathy, homeopathy, mind-body techniques and a host of others
in an attempt to reduce symptoms, emotional and physical distress,
and even in the hope of a cure.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) define
mind-body therapies (MBT’s) as “interventions that use a variety of
techniques designed to facilitate the mind's capacity to affect
bodily functions and symptoms”. Many hospitals are seeing the
benefit of these therapies in the conjunction with current
treatments and establishing Mind-Body Cancer Research Programs or
“Alternative Therapy Centres”.[5] Hypnosis has been used to reduce
side-effects with treatment and allow patients to function better
emotionally and physically.[1-9] Many literature reviews describe
beneficial outcomes from the addition of hypnosis to conventional
protocols.[6] Quality of life in cancer patients is one common
measure for treatment success particularly in palliation. Symptoms
relating to psychological distress and existential concerns are
even more prevalent than pain and other physical symptoms among
those with life-limiting conditions.[5] Therefore there exists a
need for a broad and inclusive model of integration of mind-body
interventions for palliative care.
In previous studies “Existential Psychological
Theory has [been] employed as a conceptual and theoretical
foundation for the use of hypnotically facilitated therapy in the
management of intractable pain, nausea, and vomiting in end-stage,
terminally ill cancer patients.”[7] Iglesias (2004) stated ”the
existential principles of death anxiety, existential isolation, and
existential meaninglessness were addressed with a combination of
classic and Ericksonian techniques to allow medication to become
effective in treating symptoms.” After 6 sessions patients
previously unresponsive to medical management became responsive to
treatment. In radiotherapy the patients wellbeing and own sense of
mental health showed improvement without symptom improvement having
statistical significance.[8] Just as with psychotherapy and
prescribing habits can vary greatly so too can hypnotherapy
techniques. As with all treatments, the focus of the hypnotherapy
is to ameliorate the effects of pain and to restore a level of
psychological and physical wellbeing and functioning.[5-9] Specific
non-Ericksonian hypnosis techniques were used in the following
study designed to improve quality of life in a sample of cancer
patients.

Patients and Methods
The study was conducted on nine patients (4 male
and 5 female) with various cancers, one with prostate, two with
bowel, three with breast, and two with esophageal cancer. To
participate patients obtained a referral from their treating doctor
and were required to remain on current conventional medical
treatment unless modified by their treating doctor. The EORTC
QOL-QC 30 core questionnaire was used to assess changes in
perceived quality of life. Questionnaires were completed at the
initial interview and then prior to each hypnosis session. All
patients were able to complete questionnaires unassisted and all
questions were answered. Patients were also given a hypnosis CD to
listen to once a day during the course of the study. Each patient
received six hypnotherapy sessions, the sessions were conducted by
the same hypnotherapist each time. Statistical analysis was
performed using paired t-test analysis.
Results
Of the nine patients commencing the study eight
were able to complete all six sessions of hypnotherapy. One female
patient withdrew after four sessions due to weakness following
intensive radiotherapy. The average age of male patients was 63
years (range 50-76 years), and the average age of female patients
was 56 years (range 47-64 years). All patients completing the study
maintained regular contact with their doctor. Data was analysed
from questionnaires for the initial session (pre-treatment) and
final session.
|

Figure 1. Global health status/QOL (ql), the
functional scales (rf, sf, pf, ef, cf), the symptom scales (nv, pa,
fa) and a single items (di, co, dy, sl, ap, fi) for the study
participants comparing pre-treatment with completion
questionnaires.
|
Figure 1 demonstrates that the study patients
have improved values on all functional scales and also have reduced
average levels on symptom scales.
Responses from the questionnaire were evaluated
comparing the initial questionnaire with the final questionnaire.
Statistically significant improvements were noted with Fatigue (fa)
(35.75% to 12.38%; p<0.0044), Global health status (ql) (63.5%
to 79.00%; p<0.0058), Insomnia (sl) (53.75% to 8.25%;
p<0.008) and Physical functioning (pf) (75.75% to 87.25%;
p<0.0395)
Moderate significance was seen in Constipation
(co) (20.63% to 4.13%; p<0.1036), Cognitive functioning (cf)
(68.75% to 85.5%; p<0.138) and Nausea (nv) (20.88% to 0%;
p<0.095).
Improvements were seen in Emotional functioning
(ef) (66.88% to 82.25%; p<0.125), Pain (pa) improved (26.88% to
14.63%; p<0.171), Diarrhea (di) (12.38% to 4.13%; p<0.171),
Role functioning (rf) (29.13% to 54.25%; p<0.351) and Dyspnoea
(dy) improved (8.25% to 4.13%; p<0.351)
Discussion
Insomnia is a prevalent form of sleep difficulty
which can affect all of the population reducing quality of life,
decreasing work potential and increasing health care
utilization.[10-11] The analysis showed that one of the most
statistically significant improvements was in insomnia
(p<0.008). The patient’s initial responses to insomnia were
slightly higher than those suggested for the general population.
[10] This would be expected as disease and mood factors influence
insomnia. The response to the hypnosis was rapid with most patients
reporting their insomnia was dramatically improved within the first
three sessions of hypnosis. This improvement was then maintained
for the remainder of the study. Figure 2 represents the initial and
final assessments of patients in the study and their sleep
patterns. Final responses indicate that the hypnosis treatments
allowed the patients to enjoy a much better and longer sleep.
|

Figure 2. Patient responses to insomnia
comparing initial responses with final treatment responses.
|
Figure 2 shows a graphical depiction of the four
point scale which allows patients to describe with their lack of
sleep over the past week. Sleep difficulty can also cause
irritability, depression and fatigue.[11] Anxiety and depression in
patients can be a factor increasing insomnia and treating any
underlying problem has been shown to help alleviate insomnia.[13]
Emotional functioning issues like irritability, tension, anxiety
and depression all decreased during the study period which may have
also added to the insomnia improvement.
Many symptoms that patients experience during
cancer treatments are related either to their medication or
directly to the cancer. Gastrointestinal symptoms like diarrhea and
constipation can lead to nausea and appetite loss. Throughout the
study period the participants showed increased appetite and reduced
nausea and vomiting. One patient was amazed by the return of normal
taste sensation (instead of a metallic taste) and another began to
put on weight whilst undergoing chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
Figure 3 shows the reduction in the nausea and vomiting experienced
by patients in the study.
|

Figure 3. Patient responses to nausea comparing
initial responses with final treatment responses.
|
Other studies have demonstrated improvements in
the efficacy of medication following hypnosis. [7] Over the study
period patient’s reduced “when required“anti-nausea medication the
hypnosis seemed to impact on overall nausea. This indicates that
the reduction was not merely in their perception of the symptom or
an increased effect of their current medication.
Physical functioning; which consists of ability
to take a long or short walk, the patients need to spend time in a
bed or chair, their ability to carry out their own daily activities
and ability to perform strenuous activity, improved as a result of
the hypnosis sessions. During the study there were changes that
occurred in patient’s perception of daily activities. Initially
many patients described a long walk as being a distance of one
kilometre, however, at the conclusion of the study many patients
perceived a long walk to be four kilometres or more. The increase
in energy described by patients and the change in their perception
of a long walk may indicate that there were direct effects on the
body’s energy levels from the hypnosis not just an increase in
sleep reducing fatigue.
Fatigue has been seen as one of the most common
symptoms experienced by cancer patients and is associated with
significant impairment in functioning and overall quality of life.
[14] Fatigue showed the greatest response statistically, with all
patients describing increased energy levels, decreased time spent
at rest and a greater ability to live their lives the way they
wish. Although the precise pathophysiology of fatigue in cancer is
not well known [14] figure 4 shows that hypnosis had a profound
effect on participant’s experience of fatigue in this study.
|

Figure 4. Constructed graphs
showing patient responses to fatigue comparing initial responses
with final treatment responses.
|
Global health status / QOL represents a patients
feeling as to their overall wellbeing. It is based upon that
individual’s beliefs and experiences. Psychiatric disorders, such
as major depressive disease and post traumatic stress disorder, are
significantly associated with lower functional scales ('emotional
functioning', 'body image' and 'future perspective') and higher
symptom scales ('appetite loss', 'diarrhea', 'fatigue' and
'nausea-vomiting') in QOL.[15] During the study some of the
participant’s global health status measure dipped dramatically
after the second session, even with improvements in all other
aspects of their questionnaire. When participants were questioned
about this decline they stated that they were previously comparing
their QOL with when they were sick, now they compared it to how
they felt before they had any symptoms. All patients in their
subsequent questionnaires then showed improved global health
status, this indicates the change in outlook of participants to
their quality of life.

Conclusions
The hypnotic techniques used in this study showed
improvements in all aspects of the patient’s quality of life.
Patients had more energy and were more active after hypnosis more
able to cope with the difficulties that they face in their every
day lives. A clinically significant improvement was seen with
insomnia, nausea, physical functioning, and global health status.
Hypnosis can effect perception of symptoms however in this study
the results seemed to point to a deeper change with energy and
fatigue being modified positively. The experience of hypnosis was
described as beneficial by all patients and reductions in symptoms
and increased overall quality of life. Patients commented that they
would have seen the best benefit if hypnosis was begun around the
time of diagnosis of cancer and continuing throughout their
treatment.
In this study, hypnosis has been beneficial for
symptom control and in increasing the quality of life in patients
with cancer. Further research into the use of specific
non-Ericksonian hypnosis techniques for symptom control and
improved quality of life involving a larger number of participants,
are needed to support these results.

Introduction / Trial Participant
1 / Trial Participant
2 / Trial Participant
3 / Trial Participant
4
Trial
Participant 5 / Trial Participant
6 / Trial Participant
7 / Trial Participant
8 / Trial Participant
9 Cancer Trial
Results / Cancer trial
References / Cancer Hypnosis
Testimonials

How Hypnosis
Works / How To Use
CD's / Benefits Of
CD's / Rick Collingwood
Hypnosis Range
Children's
Hypnosis Range / Tania
Cotterell Hypnosis Range / Jan Duncan Hypnosis Range
Bright
Beginnings CD's / Inna
Segal CD's / Meditation
CD's / Pet CD's
Frequently
Asked Questions About Hypnosis
View Our
Range Of Other Products
Home
 |